Now i speak with an egyptian atheist blogger.The blogger was born as muslim but become atheist.He say me that Islam is a dangerous religion.He say that Catholic christianity in the past make crimies but he say that cant find orthodox christian crimies or coptic crimies.I say to him that i can find atheist crimies.In Soviet union and french revolution atheists kill many peoople more than catholic church.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/541387He say that this crimies become from exchristians atheists not exmuslims atheists.What i must answer to him?
Comments
The Roman Catholic church has had many problems throughout history and has not dealt properly with them, but due to how europen was formed and even the world there would undoubtedly be major conflicts. Having to deal with kings and leaders would of brought them to many political situations and further away from solitary needed for spiritual growth.
The Coptic church has been blessed by solitary and to keep its integrity even with Muslim invasion.
The moves away from spiritual life is obvious in some churches history however the answer is that all are judged by their works that come from heart and conscience.
As this blogger says perfectly:
"Here's the thing. If you write a book called God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything, you sell a lot of books. If you write a book called What's So Great About Christianity on the evils of atheism, you also sell a lot of books. If you say that neither extremist viewpoint makes any sense, you end up doing a podcast and working as a greeter at Wal-Mart directing customers to the section where they sell Hitchens and D'Souza books. The truth is less incisive, it's less inflammatory, it raises no ire, and it draws no audience."
Source: https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4076
Take a look at each massacre done or committed, tally up the kills, but also research into them to see the main driving force behind them. The world is not black and white, religion vs atheism. There are shades of grey because people worship selfish means rather than ultimate religious purposes, for the most part. There are few exceptions in history, but you can't pin everything on religion, even if religion was tagged to it. A true historian will share with you figures and facts, and not propaganda for their cause. Don't buy into the propaganda.
I am anti-Catholic dogmatically, but in all the issues of history and persecution, if that was a reason to hate them, I dig myself in a very weak foundation of my own Orthodox faith, and I live partially for the purpose of hating the other rather than seeing the ultimate good in my Church and hoping to bring that to other people. Furthermore, the Catholic Church does have some level of beauty in their traditions I cannot ignore, many of which emulate their Orthodox past in which I would hope sow the seeds of their own correction. To that I say "Glory to God" for whatever good they may have.
I even say that to others who spend about 90% of their time spewing hate on Islam. I wonder is that really what your Christian faith is based on? To be "anti-" something. The only thing we should be "anti-" is our own propensity to sin and the devil himself.
I hate to look like someone who "defends" the Catholic Church, but frankly, I do get tired of people who come to learn of Oriental Orthodoxy in part because they already grew up to hate the Roman Catholic Church. In order to learn about our Church, you must let go of any hatred, find the good in what you belonged, and then bring your admiration in the Orthodox Church solely for her Orthodoxy and her saints, not for every nook and cranny of history you read. Otherwise, you will be disappointed.
I am accusing the catholic church of these crimes,not the vatican 2 sect .